There was still much unknown in regard to human hearing. This study explored to the extent of alert tone which could enhance people’s memory accuracy and decrease the reaction time. The goal was to achieve rapid response and identification of the warning sounds. The experiment adopted a compound warning sound that varied in volume and frequencies (one octave as a unit) to investigate human auditory vigilance. In this study, a 3×3 experimental design was used. A total of 33 subjects participated in this experiment. The independent variables were frequency with three levels and loudness with three levels. The frequency factor was divided into two groups: a group of 4 unit octave (0, -4, +4 octave), another group of 8 unit octave (0, -8, +8 octave). The three volume settings were 55, 65, 75 dB. The dependent variables were accuracy and reaction time. The results showed that the correct recognition rate was significantly affected by 4 unit octave difference (p-value=0.27) and loudness (p-value=0.004). But the results were significantly affected by the reaction time. Another results showed that the correct recognition rate was significantly affected by 8 unit octave difference (p-value=0.004). The results also had significant effects on reaction time (p-value=0.02). But the results were significantly affected by the loudness. The results of this study may provide control room designer for select the alert tone of frequency and loudness for different warning signals to find out the best solution for users to facilitate identification for human vigilance hearing performance.
目 錄
摘要 II
Abstract III
圖目錄 VII
表目錄 VIII
第一章 緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究目的 2
1-3 研究方法 3
1-4 研究步驟 4
1-5 本文結構 6
第二章 文獻探討 8
2-1 聽覺 8
2-1-1聲音之導論 8
2-1-2聽覺的產生 10
2-1-3人耳感測聲音之範圍及靈敏度 11
2-2警報系統之設計原則 13
2-2-1人類訊息處理 13
2-2-2聽覺信號之偵檢 14
2-2-3聽覺警報的設計原則 16
2-3警報設計相關研究 19
2-3-1聲音響度之設定 19
2-3-2聲音播放長度之設定 21
第三章 研究方法 22
3-1研究方法 22
3-1-1受測者 22
3-1-2實驗環境與設備 23
3-1-3實驗室架設 27
3-1-4實驗流程 28
3-2實驗設計 30
3-2-1自變數 31
3-2-2 應變數 38
3-3實驗程序 38
3-4數據分析 41
第四章 研究結果 42
4-1 第一組目標聲音:-4、0、+4單位八度音階之變異數分析 42
4-2 第二組目標聲音:-8、0、+8單位八度音階之變異數分析 46
4-3 比較分析 49
第五章 討論與結論 53
5-1 討論 54
5-1-1頻率 54
5-1-2 音量 56
5-1-3 正確答案出現順序及聲音殘留干擾之影響 58
5-1-4 限制 60
5-2 結論 61
5-3 未來研究方向 62
參考文獻 63
附錄 66
1. 張春興，1995，現代心理學，初版，台灣東華書局，台北。
2. 行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所，1998，防護具選用技術手冊
－防音防護具，正中書局，台北。
3. 張一岑，1998，人因工程學，揚智文化，台北。
4. 許勝雄，吳水丕，彭游，1998，人因工程，工程與設計之人性因素
（上冊），滄海書局，台中。
5. 李開偉，2001，人因工程，基礎與應用，全華科技圖書（股）公司，臺北，頁9-1 至9-42。
6. 李開偉，2003，實用人因工程學，全華科技圖書（股）公司，臺北，頁11-1 至11-23。
7. 李再長，黃雪玲，李永輝，王明揚，2005，人因工程，華泰文化事業股份有限公司，台北市。
8. 楊昌裔，2006，工業安全與衛生，全華科技圖書股份有限公司，台北市，頁17-1至17-35。
9. 鄭昭明，2006，認知心理學：理論與實踐(三版)，桂冠圖書股份有限公司，台北市，頁95至頁97。
10. 姜定宇，留佳莉，危芷芬，余振民，2009，心理學導論，五南圖書出版股份有限公司，台北市，頁77至頁78。
11. 游恆山，2010，心理學（五版），台灣培生教育出版股份有限公司，台北市，頁171至頁172。
12. 趙金榮，林久翔，馮文陽，姚怡然，曾楓億，2011，人因工程，高立圖書有限公司，新北市。
13. 碩士論文：陳文英，2002，整合式防危警示系統之介面的評估與改善，國立清華大學。
14. 碩士論文：江孟芬，2003，晶圓廠緊急防危監控系統視、聽覺顯示對系統績效之影響，國立清華大學。
15. 科林聽力保健中心耳朵小百科: http://www.ear.com.tw/Hearing/Hearing1.htm, 2011/04/06
16. 勞工安全衛生研究所: http://www.iosh.gov.tw/, 2011/04/06
17. American National Standards Institute(ANSI),1966, “Standard specification for octave Half-octave, and third-octave band filter sets(ANSI S1.11-1966)”, New York.
18. Cheng,B., Masahiro H., Takamasa S., 2002, “Analysis of driver response to collision warning during car following”, Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan, 23, p.p.231~237.
19. Marshall,D.C., Lee,J,D. and Austria,P.A,2007, “ Alerts for In-Vehicle Information Systems: Annoyance, Urgency, and Appropriateness”, Human Factors, Vol. 49, p.p.145-157.
20. Deatherage, B. H. 1972, “ Auditory and other sensory forms of information presentation”, In H. P. Van Cott and R. G. Kinkade(eds.), Human engineering guide to equipment design. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office,p.p.123-160
21. Stefanics, G., Stavrinou, M., Sestieri, C., Ciancetta, L., Belardinelli, P., Cianflone, F., Bemath, L., Hernadi, I., Pizzella, V. and Romani, G. L.,2004,“Cross-modal visual–auditory–somatosensory integration in a multimodal object recognition task in humans”, International Congress Series, p.p. 163-166.
22. Casail ,J. G., Robinson, G. S., Dabney, E. C. and Gauger, D.,2004, “Effect of Electronic ANR and onventional Hearing Protectors on Vehicle Backup Alarm Detection in Noise”, Human Factors, Vol. 46, p.p. 1-10.
23. Stephan, K. L., Smith, S. E., Martin, R. L., Parker, S.P.A. and McAnally, K. I., 2006, “ Learning and Retention of ssociations Between Auditory Icons and Denotative Referents: Implications for the Design of Auditory Warnings “,Human Factors, Vol. 48, p.p. 288-299.
24. Miller, M.E. and Beaton R.J.,1994, “ The Alarming Sounds of Silence” , Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, issue 1,p.p. 21-23.
25. Patterson, R.D.,1982, “Guidelines for auditory warning systems on civil aircraft(CAA Paper 82017),London: Civil Aviation Authority.
26. Bolia, R.S., Angelo, W.R.D’, Mishler, P.J. and Morris L.J. ,2001,“Effects of Hearing Protectors on Auditory Localization in Azimuth and Elevation” Human Factors, Vol. 43, p.p. 122-128.
27. Sanders, M. S.,& McCormick, E. J., 1987, Human factors in engineering and design, New York: McGraw-Hill.
28. Schweinberger, S.R., 2001,“Human brain potential correlates of voice priming and voice recognition,” Neuropsychologia, Vol. 39, p.p.921-936.
被引用:
點閱:446
評分:
下載:44
書目收藏:0
