SNaPshot

Abstract:

Genetic family trees, especially those of celebrities, have become the research focuses of genetic genealogy in recent years. Among them, the history of Sima Guang’s family tree has lasted for a thousand years with full records, which provides a good case for cross-disciplinary studies. In this study, eleven clans claiming to be descendants of Sima Guang were genotyped for 17 Y chromosomal short tandem repeats (STRs). The results indicated that five clans of them showed very close (the maximum number of mutation steps was four) relationships on their STR hyplotypes. Further tests of single nucleotide polymorphisms(SNPs) showed that they all belonged to a downstream haplogroup O1a1a1a1a1a-F492+,F656-. So, we can infer Sima Guang’s paternal lineage was most likely to be that haplogroup. Furthermore, a genealogical tree based on stemmata from these clans was constructed. Then, in order to verify the authenticity of the tree, we calculated the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) of these clans hierarchically using BATWING method. And we found the time nodes recorded in the tree were in accordance with the TMRCA. This study offered a successful case of using paternal lineage to collate and reconstruct family pedigree. In addition, this investigation will facilitate studies on Sima Qian and the imperial house of the Western Jin Dynasty

Key words: Sima Guang, Genetic genealogy, Y chromosome, Paternal genetic lineage, SnaPshot

家族 支系 样本编号 G_DYS19 B_DYS389I B_DYS389II B_DYS390 Y_DYS391 Y_DYS392 Y_DYS393 R_DYS437 R_DYS438 Y_DYS439 R_DYS448 B_DYS456 G_DYS458 Y_DYS635 R_Y_GATA_H4 G_DYS385a G_DYS385b SNP单倍群
洛阳1 SMG SMG01-3 15 14 16 24 9 13 14 14 10 11 18 15 14 21 13 13 18 O1b-M268+, P31+, PK4-, M176-
SMG04-8 15 14 17 24 9 13 14 14 10 11 18 15 14 21 13 13 18 O1b-M268+, P31+, PK4-, M176-
SMG09-11 15 14 17 24 9 13 14 14 10 11 18 15 14 21 13 13 19 O1b-M268+, P31+, PK4-, M176-
洛阳2 WGD WGD01-2 17 13 16 24 10 11 13 14 10 9 20 15 16 20 12 12 19 C2-M217
WGD03-7 17 13 16 24 10 11 13 14 10 9 20 15 16 20 12 12 20 C2-M217
WGD08-9 17 13 16 24 10 11 13 14 10 9 20 15 16 20 12 13 20 C2-M217
WGD10 17 13 16 24 10 11 14 14 10 9 20 15 16 20 12 12 20 C2-M217
WGD11 17 13 16 24 10 10 13 14 10 9 20 15 16 20 12 12 20 C2-M217
无锡1 WXA WX03 17 12 17 24 10 13 12 15 10 12 21 15 17 21 12 14 18 O2a2*-P201
WXB WX04 14 12 16 24 10 14 12 15 11 12 20 15 19 20 11 19 19 O2a2b1a1-M117
WX05-7 14 12 16 24 10 14 12 15 11 12 20 15 18 20 11 19 19 O2a2b1a1-M117
WX08 14 12 16 24 10 14 12 15 11 12 20 15 18 20 11 19 20 O2a2b1a1-M117
绍兴 SX SX 15 12 17 23 11 14 13 14 10 11 18 17 15 19 12 13 14 O1a1a-P203
夏县 XX XX01-5 15 12 17 23 10 14 13 14 10 11 18 17 15 19 12 14 14 O1a1a-P203
XX06 15 12 17 23 10 14 13 14 10 11 18 17 15 19 12 13 14 O1a1a-P203
无锡2 WXC WX01 15 12 17 23 11 14 13 14 10 12 18 17 16 19 12 10 13 O1a1a-P203
无锡3 WX02 15 12 17 23 11 14 13 14 10 12 18 16 16 19 12 10 13 O1a1a-P203
无锡4 WX11,13 15 12 17 23 11 14 13 14 10 12 18 17 15 19 11 10 13 O1a1a-P203
WXE WX10 16 12 16 23 10 14 13 14 10 11 18 16 15 19 11 13 13 O1a1a1a-F140+, F492-
WXF WX12 15 12 16 23 10 12 13 14 10 12 19 16 17 19 13 12 18 O2a2b1-M134+, M117-
WXG WX14 14 14 17 23 10 14 13 14 11 11 19 16 17 21 13 10 13 N-M231
WXH WX15 15 13 16 25 11 13 14 14 10 11 18 15 18 22 10 13 18 O1b1a1a-M95
无锡5 WXD WX09 15 14 17 24 10 14 12 15 11 12 20 16 18 21 11 13 17 O2a2b1a1-M117
无锡6 WXI WX16-17 14 12 16 23 10 12 12 15 10 13 19 15 17 19 12 12 16 O2a2b1-M134+, M117-
无锡7 WXJ WX18-21 15 12 17 25 9 13 12 15 10 11 21 15 18 22 12 10 22 O2a2b-P164+, M134-

表2 17Y-STR和SNP类型的分型结果

Tab.2 The genotyping results of 17Y-STR and SNP

家族 支系 样本编号 G_DYS19 B_DYS389I B_DYS389II B_DYS390 Y_DYS391 Y_DYS392 Y_DYS393 R_DYS437 R_DYS438 Y_DYS439 R_DYS448 B_DYS456 G_DYS458 Y_DYS635 R_Y_GATA_H4 G_DYS385a G_DYS385b SNP单倍群
洛阳1 SMG SMG01-3 15 14 16 24 9 13 14 14 10 11 18 15 14 21 13 13 18 O1b-M268+, P31+, PK4-, M176-
SMG04-8 15 14 17 24 9 13 14 14 10 11 18 15 14 21 13 13 18 O1b-M268+, P31+, PK4-, M176-
SMG09-11 15 14 17 24 9 13 14 14 10 11 18 15 14 21 13 13 19 O1b-M268+, P31+, PK4-, M176-
洛阳2 WGD WGD01-2 17 13 16 24 10 11 13 14 10 9 20 15 16 20 12 12 19 C2-M217
WGD03-7 17 13 16 24 10 11 13 14 10 9 20 15 16 20 12 12 20 C2-M217
WGD08-9 17 13 16 24 10 11 13 14 10 9 20 15 16 20 12 13 20 C2-M217
WGD10 17 13 16 24 10 11 14 14 10 9 20 15 16 20 12 12 20 C2-M217
WGD11 17 13 16 24 10 10 13 14 10 9 20 15 16 20 12 12 20 C2-M217
无锡1 WXA WX03 17 12 17 24 10 13 12 15 10 12 21 15 17 21 12 14 18 O2a2*-P201
WXB WX04 14 12 16 24 10 14 12 15 11 12 20 15 19 20 11 19 19 O2a2b1a1-M117
WX05-7 14 12 16 24 10 14 12 15 11 12 20 15 18 20 11 19 19 O2a2b1a1-M117
WX08 14 12 16 24 10 14 12 15 11 12 20 15 18 20 11 19 20 O2a2b1a1-M117
绍兴 SX SX 15 12 17 23 11 14 13 14 10 11 18 17 15 19 12 13 14 O1a1a-P203
夏县 XX XX01-5 15 12 17 23 10 14 13 14 10 11 18 17 15 19 12 14 14 O1a1a-P203
XX06 15 12 17 23 10 14 13 14 10 11 18 17 15 19 12 13 14 O1a1a-P203
无锡2 WXC WX01 15 12 17 23 11 14 13 14 10 12 18 17 16 19 12 10 13 O1a1a-P203
无锡3 WX02 15 12 17 23 11 14 13 14 10 12 18 16 16 19 12 10 13 O1a1a-P203
无锡4 WX11,13 15 12 17 23 11 14 13 14 10 12 18 17 15 19 11 10 13 O1a1a-P203
WXE WX10 16 12 16 23 10 14 13 14 10 11 18 16 15 19 11 13 13 O1a1a1a-F140+, F492-
WXF WX12 15 12 16 23 10 12 13 14 10 12 19 16 17 19 13 12 18 O2a2b1-M134+, M117-
WXG WX14 14 14 17 23 10 14 13 14 11 11 19 16 17 21 13 10 13 N-M231
WXH WX15 15 13 16 25 11 13 14 14 10 11 18 15 18 22 10 13 18 O1b1a1a-M95
无锡5 WXD WX09 15 14 17 24 10 14 12 15 11 12 20 16 18 21 11 13 17 O2a2b1a1-M117
无锡6 WXI WX16-17 14 12 16 23 10 12 12 15 10 13 19 15 17 19 12 12 16 O2a2b1-M134+, M117-
无锡7 WXJ WX18-21 15 12 17 25 9 13 12 15 10 11 21 15 18 22 12 10 22 O2a2b-P164+, M134-
图5 司马光家族谱系图 1)此处“8▲”表示从司马逊到司马公鞼中间隔有8 代人,谱系图中类似地方也用数字表示间隔代数。2)此处“*”:《宋史》等资料记载司马康为司马光之子,然而其他私家著作(如苏轼《西楼贴·与堂兄三首》和邵雍《闻见录》)提到康是由光兄司马旦之子过继(详参颜中其《司马康为司马光兄亲子》,《古籍整理研究学刊》1988 年第3 期),《梁溪司马氏宗谱》沿袭《宋史》观点。实际上,由于Y 染色体父系遗传的特点,司马康究竟是司马光或者是司马旦的子嗣不影响本文的结论。3)此处“?1”:根据家谱记载,司马池生卒时间为公元976-1041,与《司马光年谱》记载的公元979-1041 有差别,特此说明。4) 此处“?2”:根据家谱记载,司马康生卒时间为公元1052-1089 年,与《续资治通鉴长编》记载的公元1050-1090 年有差别,特此说明。5)此处“?3”:根据家谱,司马槙为司马康亲子,但《建炎以来系年要录》载司马光孙司马植死后,以“再从孙稹”继嗣,即司马槙可能并非司马植亲子。需要指出的是,《要录》中的“司马稹”与家谱中的“司马槙”应是同一人。6)此处“?4”:家谱记载司马宗召生卒时间为1156-1214,但后文又说“宗召于靖康(1127 年)中以遗荫佐无锡”,并且与其父司马枢的生卒时间(1074-1136)不符。同时,《建炎以来系年要录》记载,绍兴六年(1136 年)“吉州万安县丞司马宗召添差两浙路转运司干办公事”。因此,我们推断宗召生于“绍兴二十六年(公元1156 年)”一句有误。7)此处“?5”和“?6”:绍兴的这一支因没有家谱,已不清楚是司马光的几世孙。 Fig.5 The genealogical tree of Sima Guang family

图5 司马光家族谱系图 1)此处“8▲”表示从司马逊到司马公鞼中间隔有8 代人,谱系图中类似地方也用数字表示间隔代数。2)此处“*”:《宋史》等资料记载司马康为司马光之子,然而其他私家著作(如苏轼《西楼贴·与堂兄三首》和邵雍《闻见录》)提到康是由光兄司马旦之子过继(详参颜中其《司马康为司马光兄亲子》,《古籍整理研究学刊》1988 年第3 期),《梁溪司马氏宗谱》沿袭《宋史》观点。实际上,由于Y 染色体父系遗传的特点,司马康究竟是司马光或者是司马旦的子嗣不影响本文的结论。3)此处“?1”:根据家谱记载,司马池生卒时间为公元976-1041,与《司马光年谱》记载的公元979-1041 有差别,特此说明。4) 此处“?2”:根据家谱记载,司马康生卒时间为公元1052-1089 年,与《续资治通鉴长编》记载的公元1050-1090 年有差别,特此说明。5)此处“?3”:根据家谱,司马槙为司马康亲子,但《建炎以来系年要录》载司马光孙司马植死后,以“再从孙稹”继嗣,即司马槙可能并非司马植亲子。需要指出的是,《要录》中的“司马稹”与家谱中的“司马槙”应是同一人。6)此处“?4”:家谱记载司马宗召生卒时间为1156-1214,但后文又说“宗召于靖康(1127 年)中以遗荫佐无锡”,并且与其父司马枢的生卒时间(1074-1136)不符。同时,《建炎以来系年要录》记载,绍兴六年(1136 年)“吉州万安县丞司马宗召添差两浙路转运司干办公事”。因此,我们推断宗召生于“绍兴二十六年(公元1156 年)”一句有误。7)此处“?5”和“?6”:绍兴的这一支因没有家谱,已不清楚是司马光的几世孙。

Fig.5 The genealogical tree of Sima Guang family

Clan EMR lmMR OMRB OMRS
TMRCA 95% CI TMRCA 95% CI TMRCA 95% CI TMRCA 95% CI
SX-WXC-XX 4371.3 569.2-31873.6 1160.7 159.5-7616.8 1147.6 157.3-7545.2 911.6 121.9-6086.5
SX-WXC 4405.4 353.1-48602.5 1145.7 87.6-12491.4 1120.5 85.9-12328.3 898.0 66.1-10179.8
SX-XX 1204.4 50.0-16042.0 328.3 12.6-4604.3 312.7 12.1-4392.6 247.3 9.3-3589.0
WXC-XX 4446.4 553.3-32870.1 1213.3 156.0-8263.8 1182.5 152.2-8083.7 948.9 119.2-6623.7
WXC 3833.7 210.6-53229.6 1007.8 48.2-15604.5 978.1 45.8-15397.8 774.5 34.8-12630.9
XX -- -- -- -- -- --- -- --

表3 目标支系共祖时间的估计

Tab.3 The TMRCA of objective clans

Clan EMR lmMR OMRB OMRS
TMRCA 95% CI TMRCA 95% CI TMRCA 95% CI TMRCA 95% CI
SX-WXC-XX 4371.3 569.2-31873.6 1160.7 159.5-7616.8 1147.6 157.3-7545.2 911.6 121.9-6086.5
SX-WXC 4405.4 353.1-48602.5 1145.7 87.6-12491.4 1120.5 85.9-12328.3 898.0 66.1-10179.8
SX-XX 1204.4 50.0-16042.0 328.3 12.6-4604.3 312.7 12.1-4392.6 247.3 9.3-3589.0
WXC-XX 4446.4 553.3-32870.1 1213.3 156.0-8263.8 1182.5 152.2-8083.7 948.9 119.2-6623.7
WXC 3833.7 210.6-53229.6 1007.8 48.2-15604.5 978.1 45.8-15397.8 774.5 34.8-12630.9
XX -- -- -- -- -- --- -- --
Skorecki K, Selig S, Blazer S, et al. Y chromosomes of Jewish priests[J]. Nature, 1997,385(6611):32-32 doi: 10.1038/385032a0 pmid: 8985243 Foster EA, Jobling MA, Taylor PG, et al. Jefferson fathered slave’s last child[J]. Nature, 1998,396(6706):27-8 pmid: 9817200 Zerjal T, Xue Y, Bertorelle G, et al. The genetic legacy of the Mongols[J]. Am J Hum Genet. 2003,72(3):717-21 doi: 10.1086/367774 pmid: 12592608 Abilev S, Malyarchuk B, Derenko M, et al. The Y-chromosome C3* star-cluster attributed to Genghis Khan’s descendants is present at high frequency in the Kerey clan from Kazakhstan[J]. Hum Biol, 2012,84(1):79-89 doi: 10.3378/027.084.0106 pmid: 22452430 Batbayar K, Sabitov ZM. The Genetic Origin of the Turko-Mongols and Review of The Genetic Legacy of the Mongols. Part 1: The Y-chromosomal Lineages of Chinggis Khan[J]. 2012 Bogdanowicz W. Genetic identification of putative remains of the famous astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus.[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009,106(30):12279-12282 pmid: 19584252 Olalde I, Sánchezquinto F, Datta D, et al. Genomic analysis of the blood attributed to Louis XVI (1754-1793), king of France[J]. Scientific Reports, 2014,4(7497):4666 King TE, Fortes GG, Balaresque P, et al. Identification of the remains of King Richard III[J]. Nature Communications, 2014,5(1828):5631 王传超, 严实, 侯铮, 等. Y 染色体揭开曹操身世之谜[J]. 现代人类学通讯, 2011,5:107-111 Wang CC, Yan S, Hou Z, et al. Present Y chromosomes reveal the ancestry of Emperor CAO Cao of 1800 years ago[J]. Journal of Human Genetics, 2012,57(3):216-218 pmid: 22189622 Wang CC, Yan S, Yao C, et al. Ancient DNA of Emperor CAO Cao’s granduncle matches those of his present descendants: a commentary on present Y chromosomes reveal the ancestry of Emperor CAO Cao of 1800 years ago[J]. Journal of Human Genetics, 2013,58(4):238-239 doi: 10.1038/jhg.2013.5 pmid: 23407348 文少卿, 王传超, 敖雪, 等. 古DNA证据支持曹操的父系遗传类型属于单倍群O2[J].人类学学报, 2016(4):617-625 Yan S, Tachibana H, Wei LH, et al. Y chromosome of Aisin Gioro, the imperial house of the Qing dynasty.[J]. Journal of Human Genetics, 2015,60(6):295-298 doi: 10.1038/jhg.2015.28 pmid: 25833470 Wei LH, Yan S, Yu G, et al. Genetic trail for the early migrations of Aisin Gioro, the imperial house of the Qing dynasty[J]. Journal of Human Genetics, 2016 doi: 10.1038/s10038-020-0807-x pmid: 32694621 李昌宪. 司马光评传[M]. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2002 四库全书存目丛书编纂委员会编. 四库全书存目丛书史部第84册. 济南:齐鲁书社, 1996: 72-190 司马栋. 梁溪司马氏宗谱: 二十卷[M]. 1916 马淼根. 梁溪司马氏宗谱尤家坦横街支[M]. 2013 侯伟光, 王传超, 蒋世洪, 等. 曲阜地区孔姓人群17个Y-STR基因座遗传多态性分析[J]. 人类学学报, 2016,35(1):125-131 Wang CC, Wang LX, Shrestha R, et al. Genetic Structure of Qiangic Populations Residing in the Western Sichuan Corridor[J]. Plos One, 2014,9(8):e103772-103772 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103772 pmid: 25090432 Wang CC, Wang LX, Shrestha R, et al. Convergence of Y Chromosome STR Haplotypes from Different SNP Haplogroups Compromises Accuracy of Haplogroup Prediction[J]. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 2015,42(7):403-407 doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2015.03.008 pmid: 26233895 Wen SQ, Tong XZ, Wang CZ, et al. Y-chromosomes from skeletal remains of Chinese Expeditionary Force offer a clue to their paternal relatives[J]. Science Bulletin, 2016,61(6):425-427 Zhivotovsky LA, Underhill PA, Cinnioğlu C, et al. The effective mutation rate at Y chromosome short tandem repeats, with application to human population-divergence time.[J]. American Journal of Human Genetics, 2010,74(1):50-61 doi: 10.1086/380911 pmid: 14691732 Burgarella C. Mutation rate estimates for 110 Y-chromosome STRs combining population and father-son pair data.[J]. European Journal of Human Genetics, 2011,19(1):70-5 doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.154 pmid: 20823913 Shi W, Ayub Q, Vermeulen M, et al. A Worldwide Survey of Human Male Demographic History Based on Y-SNP and Y-STR Data from the HGDP-CEPH Populations[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2010,27(2):385-93 doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp243 pmid: 19822636 Wilson IJ, Balding DJ. Inferences from DNA data: population histories, evolutionary processes and forensic match probabilities[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 2003,166(2):155-188 Zhivotovsky LA. Estimating divergence time with the use of microsatellite genetic distances: impacts of population growth and gene flow.[J]. Molecular Biology & Evolution, 2001,18(5):700. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003852 pmid: 11319254 Behar DM, Thomas MG, Skorecki K, et al. Multiple Origins of Ashkenazi Levites: Y Chromosome Evidence for Both Near Eastern and European Ancestries[J]. American Journal of Human Genetics, 2003,73(4):768 doi: 10.1086/378506 pmid: 13680527 Ramakrishnan U, Mountain JL. Precision and Accuracy of Divergence Time Estimates from STR and SNPSTR Variation[J]. Molecular Biology & Evolution, 2004,21(10):1960 doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh212 pmid: 15254260 Sengupta, Sanghamitra, Zhivotovsky, et al. Polarity and Temporality of High-Resolution Y-Chromosome Distributions in India Identify Both Indigenous and Exogenous Expansions and Reveal Minor Genetic Influence of Central Asian Pastoralists[J]. American Journal of Human Genetics, 2006,78(2):202-21 doi: 10.1086/499411 pmid: 16400607 Wang CC, Li H. Evaluating the Y chromosomal STR dating in deep-rooting pedigrees[J]. Investigative Genetics, 2015,6(1):1-3 doi: 10.1186/s13323-014-0018-3 Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Röhl A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies.[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 1999,16(1):37-48 doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026036 pmid: 10331250 Trejaut JA, Poloni ES, Yen JC, et al. Taiwan Y-chromosomal DNA variation and its relationship with Island Southeast Asia[J]. BMC Genetics, 2014,15(1):77 Deng QY, Wang CC, Wang XQ, et al. Genetic affinity between the Kam-Sui speaking Chadong and Mulam people[J]. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 2013,51(3):263-270 Yan LU, Pan SL, Qin SM, et al. Genetic evidence for the multiple origins of Pinghua Chinese[J]. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 2013,51(3):271-279 Martínez-González LJ, Martínez-Espín E, Álvarez JC, et al. Surname and Y chromosome in Southern Europe: A case study with Colom/Colombo[J]. European Journal of Human Genetics , 2012,20(2):211-6 doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.162 pmid: 21847141 Sykes B, Irven C. Surnames and the Y Chromosome[J]. American Journal of Human Genetics, 2000,66(4):1417-1419 doi: 10.1086/302850 pmid: 10739766 King TE, Ballereau SJ, Schürer KE, et al. Genetic Signatures of Coancestry within Surnames[J]. Current Biology, 2006,16(4):384-388 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.12.048 pmid: 16488872 King TE, Jobling MA. What’s in a name? Y chromosomes, surnames and the genetic genealogy revolution[J]. Trends in Genetics, 2009,25(8):351-360 doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2009.06.003 pmid: 19665817 李占军. 中华姓氏起源[M].世界社会文献出版社, 2007: 404-405 廖康强. 中华姓氏起源通史[M]. 北京: 中国商业出版社, 2014: 431-433 (宋)司马光著, 李之亮笺注. 司马温公集编年笺注(第五册)[M]. 成都:巴蜀书社, 2009: 496-498 (宋)庞籍. 天章阁待制司马府君碑铭[A].见:司马光年谱[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1990: 483 (宋)苏轼. 苏东坡全集[M]. 北京:中国书店, 1986: 420 (唐)房玄龄 等. 晋书[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1974: 1 (西汉)司马迁. 史记[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1974: 3285-3286 陈玉玲, 李敏, 赵珍敏, 李亚男, 包云, 盛翔, 朱如心, 王亚丽, 马兴元. 山东汉族人群中13个快速突变(RM)Y-STR基因座的多态性 [J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(02): 292-303. 刘树虎;伊力哈木·乃扎木;热比亚木·巴克;布帕提玛穆·阿布都克热穆;多力坤·买买提玉素甫. 应用Y染色体SNP对新疆三个隔离人群遗传多样性的研究 [J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(01): 146-156. 文少卿;王传超;敖雪;韦兰海;佟欣竹;王凌翔;王占峰;韩昇;李辉. 古DNA证据支持曹操的父系遗传类型属于单倍群O2 [J]. 人类学学报, 2016, 35(04): 617-625. 葛威. 关于曹姓家族分子人类学研究的几个问题 [J]. 人类学学报, 2016, 35(04): 626-632. 侯伟光;王传超;蒋世洪;刘海东;李辉. 曲阜地区孔姓人群17个Y-STR基因座遗传多态性分析 [J]. 人类学学报, 2016, 35(01): 125-131. 聂胜洁; 姚金勇; 陈碧峰; 庄勤勇; 张雯; 罗胜军; 肖春杰. 云南泸西汉族17个Y-STR基因座多态性及遗传关系分析 [J]. 人类学学报, 2010, 29(02): 189-196. 黄艳梅; 祁英杰; 杨保胜; 童大跃; 伍新尧. 中国云南白族和新疆维族7个Y-STR基因座的遗传多态性 [J]. 人类学学报, 2010, 29(01): 88-94. 段然慧,刘伟强,周慧,朱泓. 克里雅河下游封闭人群DYS19和DYS390多态性研究 [J]. 人类学学报, 2004, 23(04): 326-330. 黄艳梅,伍新尧,蔡贵庆,童大跃,区敬华,曾艳红. 云南白族人群Y染色体DYF155S1基因座多态性研究 [J]. 人类学学报, 2004, 23(03): 239-247. 薛雅丽,包维东,傅松滨,Tatiana Zerjal,朱苏玲,徐玖瑾,杜若甫,张贵寅,李璞,Chris Tyler-Smith. MYS2多态位点在中国26个人群中分布的研究 [J]. 人类学学报, 2003, 22(01): 63-68. 滕百军,陈峰,傅松滨,张贵寅,李璞. 我国东北地区3个群体DYS390多态位点的遗传学研究 [J]. 人类学学报, 2000, 19(04): 318-323. 吴东颖,马素参,刘明,黄尚志,刘春芸. 应用Y染色体多态标记对汉族王姓亲缘关系的研究 [J]. 人类学学报, 2000, 19(02): 132-137. 张勇,张贵寅,孙艳阳,薛雅丽,杨焕杰,陈白滨,李璞. 中国东北汉族及3个少数民族DYS19和DYS287多态性研究 [J]. 人类学学报, 1998, 17(03): 237-241. 包维东,徐玖瑾,朱苏玲,许丽萍,杜若甫. 微卫星位点DYS19在中国人群中的多态研究 [J]. 人类学学报, 1997, 16(04): 255-261.