The Climate Risk Index (CRI), published since 2006, is one of the longest running annual climate impact-related indices. The CRI analyses climate-related extreme weather events’ degree of effect on countries. In doing so, it measures the consequences of realised risks on countries.
This backward-looking index ranks countries by their economic and human impacts (fatalities as well as affected, injured, and homeless) with the most affected country ranked highest.
The CRI visualises such events’ degree of effect at two years before the index’s publication and over the preceding 30 years. The index contextualises international climate policy debates and processes with a view to the climate risk countries are facing. It simplifies the aggregation and understanding of climate-related extreme weather events’ impacts across different regions and time periods. The most strongly affected countries rank highest and should view the CRI results as a warning sign that they are at risk of frequent events or rare and unusual extreme events.
CRI 2025 ranking and results highlights
Scorching heat, heavy rainfalls, raging wildfires, deadly floods, and devastating storms: The manifestations of extreme weather events have become too common in a new reality worldwide. The Climate Risk Index 2025 relaunch sheds light on inaction’s growing cost. It reveals the mounting human and economic toll.
From 1993 to 2022, more than
765,000 lives were lost
and
direct economic losses of nearly USD 4.2 trillion
(inflation-adjusted) were recorded, driven by more than
9,400 extreme weather events
. The frequency and intensity of climate-related disasters continue to rise, and these figures underscore the urgent need for climate action.
The CRI methodology involves analysing extreme weather events’ impacts via three hazard categories: hydrological, meteorological, and climatological. The index visualises these events’ impact on countries both two years prior to publication and over the preceding 30-year period. It draws on data from the EM-DAT international disaster database, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund (IMF). The index considers absolute and relative impacts, using six key indicators: economic loss, fatalities, and affected people – each in absolute and relative terms.
Please note: We have received helpful feedback on the readability of the index. Based on this feedback, we have adjusted the annex and added a brief explanation on the method. Therefore, we have uploaded a slightly updated CRI version which you now find online. We will further improve the readability of the index and its annex for its next edition.
Explore an interactive map of the full ranking and results. Click on a country to see how extreme weather events affect it, in terms of the economic and human impacts.
2022-Map
: Most affected countries in 2022. This map highlights the countries extreme weather events most affected in 2022, based on the impacts on people and on economic loss.
1993–2022 Map
: Most affected countries in 1993–2022. This map shows the countries extreme weather events most affected from 1993 to 2022, based on the impacts on people and on economic loss.
CRI 2025 key messages
The Climate Risk Index (CRI) ranking indicates that, in 1993–2022,
Dominica, China, and Honduras
were the countries most affected by extreme weather events’ impacts.
The ranking shows
Pakistan, Belize, and Italy
as the most affected by extreme weather events’ impacts in 2022.
From
1993 to 2022, 765,000+ people died worldwide and direct losses of nearly USD 4.2 trillion (inflation-adjusted)
directly resulted from 9,400+ extreme weather events.
Floods, storms, heat waves, and drought
were the most prominent impacts from short- and long-term perspectives. From 1993 to 2022, storms (35%), heat waves (30%), and floods (27%) caused the most fatalities. Floods were responsible for over half of the people affected. Storms caused, by far, the most significant economic losses (56% or USD 2.33 trillion inflation-adjusted), followed by floods (32% or USD 1.33 trillion).
The most affected countries in the long-term index for 1993–2022 can be divided into two groups: (1) Countries most affected by highly unusual extreme events (
e.g. Dominica, Honduras, Myanmar, Vanuatu
) and (2) countries affected by recurring extreme events (
e.g. China, India, the Philippines)
. Climate science clearly shows that climate change increases the risk for both categories and contributes to transforming uncommonly extreme events into continual threats, creating a ‘new normal.’
The CRI shows that all countries are affected
. Seven of the 10 most affected countries in 2022 belonged to the high-income country group
1
. This clearly indicates that, while the coping capacities of high-income countries significantly exceed those of lower-income countries, higher-income countries should also increase their climate risk management. Over the long term, the ranking shows that extreme weather events’ impacts particularly affect Global South countries. With five countries, the lower middle-income group is the largest country group among the 10 most affected countries, including three Small Island Developing States/Least Developed Countries, where coping capacities are significantly lower.
The CRI ranking is based on the best publicly available historical data set on the extreme weather events’ impacts.
Extreme weather events and their impacts are often underreported in Global South countries
because of data quality and coverage challenges and data gaps. As a result, this ranking may less accurately capture these impacts and, therefore, how Global South countries are affected.
Human-induced climate change affects the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events and leads to widespread adverse climate impacts.
The latest climate science and significantly improved attribution science suggest climate change’s influence on extreme weather events is ‘on the same level of scientific confidence as the statement that human influence has warmed the climate.
2
COP29 failed to deliver an ambitious New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) on Climate Finance.
Considering the identified needs, and the great urgency of the climate challenges that developing countries face, the USD 300 billion annually by 2035 can only be seen as the bare minimum response to the escalating climate crisis. The NCQG also failed to include measures to address loss and damage. This gap must be filled as soon as possible. This situation is even more worrying given the extensive gaps in adaptation finance compared with the needs and commitments (even if progress was made). Substantially increased support by high-emitting countries and other polluters is needed for the most vulnerable in addressing climate impacts.
The CRI shows that a
lack of ambition and action in mitigation leads to being strongly affected,
even in high-income countries. It is in the interest of high-income and highly emitting countries to ramp up mitigation action, including higher climate targets and such action’s implementation, with new nationally determined contributions (NDCs), to stay below (or as close as possible to) 1.5°C warming and keep impacts at a manageable scale.
Footnote (
click
to open)
1: For a definition of income groups, see World Bank 2024
2: Otto,F. 2023: Attribution of Extreme Events to Climate Change. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2023. 48:813–28 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-112621-083538
CRI 2025 truly ranks Pakistan 1
st
among top ten countries most affected by extreme weather events in 2022 largely because of high economic losses worth US$30 billion. Pakistan along with G77+ had struggled to get the Loss and Damage Fund in place. The Fund and the follow up COPs 28 and 29 failed to deliver on Climate Finance so far. CRI 2025 ranking will help Pakistan understand the risks being the highest hit country to address its flood risk profile in line with the 2023 National Adaptation Plan in the aftermath of 2022 massive floods and to devise a workable plan in terms of ambitious NDCs (3.0) clearly backed by resources (global and national).
The CRI relies on the best publicly available databases for generating the results. However, data gaps arise due to variations in data quality and coverage, especially regarding the Global South. Under-representation in research, uneven distribution of meteorological stations, and differing data collection techniques across countries are among the key challenges.
The CRI database will generally be available for research and academic purposes. Please email your request for access to
[email protected]
and please provide a clear description of how you plan to use the data. Data availability will be assessed on a case-by-case basis, with preference for academic and public policy research.
Disclaimer
The content and works on these pages created by the operators of these pages are subject to German copyright law. The reproduction, processing, dissemination and all kinds of use outside the limits of copyright require the written consent of each author or creator. Downloads or copies of this publication are for private, non-commercial use only. If the content on this site was not created by the operator, the rights in copyright of third parties were respected. In particular, content of third parties is marked as such. Nevertheless, should you notice a breach of copyright, you are requested to let us know. If we become aware of a breach of the law, we will remove this content immediately.
Anthropogenic climate change is causing the average global temperature to rise increasingly faster. In the Paris Agreement, countries agreed to limit average global warming to 1.5°C if possible. Ten years after the Paris Agreement, this paper discusses whether we can still manage to stay below this limit.
The Global Climate Risk Index 2021 analyses to what extent countries and regions have been affected by impacts of weather-related loss events (storms, floods, heat waves etc.). The most recent data available — for 2019 and from 2000 to 2019 — were taken into account. The countries and territories affected most in 2019 were Mozambique, Zimbabwe as well as the Bahamas. For the period from 2000 to 2019 Puerto Rico, Myanmar and Haiti rank highest.
The Global Climate Risk Index 2020 analyses to what extent countries and regions have been affected by impacts of weather-related loss events (storms, floods, heat waves etc.). The most recent data available — for 2018 and from 1999 to 2018 — were taken into account. The countries and territories affected most in 2018 were Japan, the Philippines as well as Germany. For the period from 1999 to 2018 Puerto Rico, Myanmar and Haiti rank highest.
The Global Climate Risk Index 2019 analyses to what extent countries and regions have been affected by impacts of weather-related loss events (storms, floods, heat waves etc.). The most recent data available — for 2017 and from 1998 to 2017 — were taken into account. The countries and territories affected most in 2017 were Puerto Rico, Sri Lanka as well as Dominica. For the period from 1998 to 2017 Puerto Rico, Honduras and Myanmar rank highest.
The Global Climate Risk Index 2018 analyses to what extent countries have been affected by the impacts of weather-related loss events (storms, floods, heat waves etc.). The most recent data available – for 2016 and from 1997 to 2016 – were taken into account. The countries affected most in 2016 were Haiti, Zimbabwe as well as Fiji. For the period from 1997 to 2016 Honduras, Haiti and Myanmar rank highest.
The Global Climate Risk Index 2017 analyses to what extent countries have been affected by the impacts of weather-related loss events (storms, floods, heat waves etc.). The most recent data available – from 2015 and 1996–2015 – were taken into account. The countries affected most in 2015 were Mozambique, Dominica as well as Malawi. For the period from 1996 to 2015 Honduras, Myanmar and Haiti rank highest.
The Global Climate Risk Index 2016 analyses to what extent countries have been affected by the impacts of weather-related loss events (storms, floods, heat waves etc.). The most recent data available - from 2014 and 1995–2014 - were taken into account. The countries affected most in 2014 were Serbia, the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan as well as Bosnia and Herzegovina. For the period from 1995 to 2014 Honduras, Myanmar and Haiti rank highest.
The Global Climate Risk Index 2015 analyses to what extent countries have been affected by the impacts of weather-related loss events (storms, floods, heat waves etc.). The most recent data available – from 2013 and 1994–2013 – were taken into account. The countries affected most in 2013 were the Philippines, Cambodia and India. For the period from 1994 to 2013 Honduras, Myanmar and Haiti rank highest.
The Global Climate Risk Index 2014 analyses to what extent countries have been affected by the impacts of weather-related loss events (storms, floods, heat waves etc.). The most recent data available—from 2012 and 1993–2012—were taken into account. The countries affected most in 2012 were Haiti, the Philippines and Pakistan. For the period from 1993 to 2012 Honduras, Myanmar and Haiti rank highest.
