Abstract:
DuringtheprocessoftheformationanddisseminationofMarxistphilosophy,howtounderstandthedialecticsconstitutestobethedebatingfocusofMarxist
..sprosandcons.TheWestern
Marxologyscholarsproceededfromtheirownresearchandgaveacontemporaryinterpretationofthe
dialecticissue.Since1991,WesternMarxologyhasgonetothestageofdifferentiatingdevelopment,
dialecticsgradually“LosingSharpness”intheacademictheoreticalconstructionandjustbecameanacademicdebateontherelationshipbetweenMarxandHegel.
Startingfromthisproblem,NormanLevin,
ChristopherArthurandTonySmithofTheNew DialecticSchoolandRoyBhaskarrespectively
madethecontemporaryinterpretationsofdialectics.ButconsideringoftheinherentideologicalattributesofWesternMarxologyandthenon-
criticalnatureofacademicresearch,wemustadheretothe
latesttheoreticalachievementsofcontemporaryChinese Marxismresearchandinsistonreturning
backtohistoricaldialectics.BecausereturningtohistoricaldialecticsisnotonlyaninevitablerequirementtotranscendthelogicofWesternMarxology,
butalsothetheoreticalrequirementforinterpretingthe“
originalimage”ofclassicalwriters.What..smore,itisalsotheinherentrequirementforthe
developmentofcontemporaryChineseMarxism.
Key words:
NormanLevine,
NewDialecticSchool,
RoyBhaskar,
historicaldialectic
摘要：
在马克思主义的传播过程中,辩证法问题始终聚讼纷纭,西方“马克思学”学者基于自身的理论背景,就辩证法在马克思主义中的地位、性质和作用等问题著书立说。苏东剧变后,西方“马克思学”进入分化发展阶段,辩证法逐渐在学院派的理论构建中“失锐”,尤其体现在马克思和黑格尔的关系问题中。诺曼·莱文、新辩证法学派和罗伊·巴斯卡从文本、逻辑和体系的视域出发对辩证法进行了当代解读。但鉴于西方“马克思学”固有的意识形态属性和学院派研究的非批判性,针对西方“马克思学” 对于辩证法的“失锐式解读”,我们必须立足当代中国马克思主义研究取得的最新理论成果,坚持回到历史辩证法。这是超越西方“马克思学”理论逻辑的必然要求,是解读经典作家“理论原像”的理论要求,也是发展当代中国马克思主义的内在要求。
诺曼·莱文,
新辩证法学派,
罗伊·巴斯卡,
历史辩证法
ZhaoLi, ZhangLiang. “UnsharpInterpretation”onRelationshipbetweenMarxandHegel———Western Marxology..sDialecticsResearchProgressandReflectionsince1991[J]. Teaching and Research, 2021, 55(4): 35-43.
赵 立, 张 亮. 马克思与黑格尔关系问题的“失锐式解读”———苏东剧变以来西方“马克思学”对辩证法的研究及反思*[J]. 教学与研究, 2021, 55(4): 35-43.
