:
twitter line
研究生: 張菀芝
研究生(外文): Stacey Chang
論文名稱: 八卦的性別差異:話題與功用
論文名稱(外文): Gender Differences in Gossip: Topics and Functions
指導教授: 許洪坤 許洪坤引用關係
指導教授(外文): Joseph H. Hsu
學位類別: 碩士
校院名稱: 輔仁大學
系所名稱: 語言學研究所
學門: 人文學門
學類: 語言學類
論文種類: 學術論文
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 142
中文關鍵詞: 八卦 話題 功用 性別差異
外文關鍵詞: Gossip Topics Functions Gender Differences
相關次數:
  • 被引用 被引用: 5
  • 點閱 點閱:1091
  • 評分 評分:
  • 下載 下載:201
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單 書目收藏:1
「八卦」(gossip)是常見的社會現象。八卦的定義眾說紛紜。經過調查後,在本研究中,八卦是指未經證實就相互流傳,並涉及第三者隱私或秘密,通常為負面消息的言語行為。本篇針對「八卦對象」、「八卦話題」,以及「八卦功用」上,檢視男女在八卦時是否會依據熟悉程度,採取顯著不同的語言策略。結果歸納如下。
一、 在八卦對象的選擇上,結果顯示並沒有顯著的性別差異。男女跟很熟的朋友八卦時,均傾向八卦「要好的朋友」、「演藝人員」和「公司/學校的風雲人物」。當熟悉程度下降,人們傾向八卦「不熟的朋友」或公眾人物,如「演藝人員」。
二、 男女在與很熟的朋友、不熟的女性朋友八卦時,有顯著的性別差異。男女均傾向跟很熟的朋友八卦「感情」,尤其是女性。男性跟很熟的男性朋友會八卦「性關係」;女性會跟很熟的女性朋友八卦「外表」。男女跟普通的朋友八卦時,沒有顯著差異。男女均傾向跟不熟的朋友八卦「工作」居多。
三、 「好奇心、打發時間、好玩」、「聯絡感情」,和「分享經驗、交換訊息」是八卦的三大功用。不論熟悉程度,男女八卦都是為了「好奇心、打發時間、好玩」居多。只有女性在跟很熟的女性朋友八卦時,會為了「抱怨、訴苦等發洩情緒」而八卦。只有跟不熟的朋友八卦時,才有顯著的性別差異。女性在跟不熟的朋友八卦時,會為了「表達個人立場或立場、劃清界線」而八卦。
四、 男女均傾向八卦在年紀及性別上相似的對象。當熟悉程度降低時,他們八卦的對象才會大幅轉移到其他人物上。
五、 「感情」是八卦的主要話題之一,尤其是女性朋友之間。當熟悉程度下降,男女均傾向八卦「感情」以外的話題,因為「感情」是偏個人隱私的話題。
六、 跟男性比較起來,女性被證實比較容易會為了「抱怨、訴苦等發洩情緒」而八卦。然而一旦熟悉程度下降,女性也會開始隱藏真實情緒。
男女都會八卦,但是他們所關注的議題不同。他們都會依據談話對象的性別及熟悉程度改變八卦的語言策略。
Gossip is a common oral activity which occurs all the time. Gossip here is defined as unverified, transmitted, and usually negative news about the absent others’ privacy or secrets. I research on three main themes of gossip, including the targets, the topics, and the functions, to see how differently men and women gossip. The results show that men and women gossip differently with their friends according to the three levels of familiarity (+Familiarity, = Familiarity, and – Familiarity).
1) In the theme of gossip targets, no significant gender difference is observed. They gossip mostly about ‘close friends’, ‘entertainers’, and ‘popular personages’. As the familiarity decreases, people tend to gossip about ‘unacquainted friends’ or public figures, like ‘entertainers’.
2) About the topics of gossip, men and women gossip about significantly different topics with their familiar friends and unfamiliar female friends. People prefer to gossip about ‘relationship’ with their familiar friends. With their casual friends, no significant gender difference is perceived. With their unfamiliar friends, ‘work’ becomes their first option.
3) In the theme of functions, significant gender differences are observed when people gossip with their unfamiliar friends. ‘Curiosity, to kill time, or for fun’ plays an important role in gossip whether people are familiar with each other or not. Only when women gossip with their unfamiliar friends, they gossip more for ‘express personal opinions or attitudes, keep boundary’ than ‘bonding’.
4) People incline to gossip about the similar others with their familiar friends.
5) ‘Relationship’ is the main topics of gossip, especially between women. As the familiarity decreases, they tend to hide their love affairs.
6) ‘Complaining or releasing emotions’ is one of the main functions for women only when they gossip with familiar friends.
Both men and women gossip, but they care about different issues. They take different strategies when they gossip with people of different sex and familiarity.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT I
中 文 摘 要 III
謝 辭…………………………………………………………………………………IV
TABLE OF CONTENTS V
LIST OF TABLES VII
LIST OF CHARTS VIII

CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Rationale and Delimitation of the Research 1
1.2 Motivation of the Research 6
1.3 Objective of the Research 6
1.4 Overview of the Chapters 6
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW 8
2.1 Origin and Definitions of Gossip 8
2.2 Rumor and Gossip 10
2.3 The Motivations of Gossip 14
2.4 The Topics and Functions 28
2.5 Gender Differences 40
2.5.1 Gender differences in language 40
2.5.2 Deborah Jones & Jennifer Coates 41
2.5.3 Deborah Tannen 43
2.5.4 Michelson and Mouly 45
2.5.5 Mizokami 46
CHAPTER THREE: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 47
3.1 Definition 47
3.2 Topics 49
3.3 Functions 61
3.4 Interviews to seek for explanations 65
3.5 Theoretical Framework 68
3.6 Hypotheses 70
CHAPTER FOUR: METHODOLOGY 72
3.1 Subjects 72
3.2 Materials 72
3.3 The Design of Questionnaire 73
3.4 Procedure 75
3.5 Data Analysis 76
CHAPTER FIVE: DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION 77
5.1 Overall Description 77
5.1.1 The most potential targets 78
5.1.2 The most potential topics 84
5.1.3 The most potential functions serve for gossiping 90
5.2 The Findings 98
5.2.1 The First Finding 98
5.2.1.1 (+Familiarity) 98
5.2.1.2 (= Familiarity) 100
5.2.1.3 (– Familiarity) 101
5.2.2 The Second Finding 103
5.2.2.1 (+Familiarity) 103
5.2.2.2 (= Familiarity) 105
5.2.2.3 (– Familiarity) 105
5.2.3 The Third Finding 107
5.2.3.1 (+Familiarity) 107
5.2.3.2 (= Familiarity) 109
5.2.3.3 (– Familiarity) 109
5.2.4 The Fourth Finding 111
5.2.5 The Fifth Finding 112
5.2.6 The Sixth Finding 114
CHAPTER SIX: CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 116
6.1 Summary 116
6.2 Limitations and Suggestions for Further Studies 120

REFERENCES 121
Appendix A1 126
Appendix A2 127
Appendix B 128
Appendix C1 135
Appendix C2 139
REFERENCES


Abrahams, R. D. (1970) A performance-centered approach to gossip. Man, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 290-301.
Allport, G.W. & Postman, L. (1947). The psychology of rumor. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Amabile, T. M. (1983) Brilliant but cruel: Perceptions of negative evaluators. Journal of Experimental Social psychology, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp.146-156.
Ben-Ze’ev, A. (1994), “The vindication of gossip”, in Goodman R. F. & Ben-Ze’ev. A. (eds.) (1994) Good gossip. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, pp. 11-24.
Bergmann, J.R. (1993), Discreet Indiscretions: The Social Organization of Gossip, Aldine de Gruyter, New York, NY.
Coates, J. (1989), “Gossip revisited: language in all-female groups.” In Coates, J. & Cameron D. (eds.) (1989) Women in Their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex.
Coates, J. (1993) Women, Men and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Sex Differences in Language.
Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Eder, D. &Enke, J. L. (1991) The structure of gossip: Opportunities and constraints on collective expression among adolescents. American Sociological Review, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 494-508.
Eggins, S. & Slade D. (1997) Analyzing Casual Conversation, the seventh chapter, Gossip. London ; New York : Cassell.
Fine, G. A. (1985) Rumors and Gossiping. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis Vol. 3, Discourse and Dialogue. (1985) Academic Press London. pp.223-237.
Gluckman, M. (1963) Gossip and scandal. Current Anthropology, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp.307-16.
Goffman, E. (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Goodman R. F. & Ben-Ze’ev. A. (eds.) (1994) Good gossip. University Press of Kansas.
Hogg, M.A. 2000. Social identity and social comparison. In J. Suls & L. Wheeler (Eds.). Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. pp.401-422.
Jaeger, M. E., Skelder, A.A., Rind, B., & Rosnow, R. L. (1994), Gossip, gossipers, gossipees. In Robert F. Goodman & Aaron Ben-Ze’ev. (eds.) (1994) Good gossip. University Press of Kansas. pp.154-168.
Jones, D. (1980), Gossip: notes on women’s oral culture. In Cameron, D. (ed.) (1990) The Feminist Critique of Language: A Reader. London: Routledge.
Klapp, Orrin E. (1972), Currents of Unrest: An Introduction to Collective Behavior. New York;Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Kuttler, A. F., Parker, J. G., & La Greca, A. M. (2002) Developmental and Gender Differences in Preadolescents' Judgments of the Veracity of Gossip. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 105-132.
Lakoff, R. (1975) Language and Women’s Place. New York: Harper & Row.
Leaper, C. & Holliday, H. (1995) Gossip in same-gender and cross-gender friends’ conversations. Personal Relationships, Vol.2, pp.237-246
Levin, J. & Arluke, A. (1985) An exploratory analysis of sex differences in gossip, Sex Roles, Vol.12, No.3/4, pp. 281-286
Maltz, D. & R. Borker (1982) ‘A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication’. In J. J. Gumpertz (ed.) (1982) Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Michelson, G. & Mouly, Suchitra. (2000) Rumour and gossip in organizations: a conceptual study. Management Decision. 38/5 [2000] 339-346
Mishra, J. (1990) “Managing the grapevine”, Public Personnel Management, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp.213-18.
Mizokami, Y. (2001) Does'Women's Language'Really Exist? -A Critical Assessment of Sex Difference Research in Sociolinguistics- Multicultural Studies (Academic Journal ,2001 ) / 創刊 1 , 141-159
Morreall J. (1994), Gossip and Humor. In Robert F. Goodman & Aaron Ben-Ze’ev. (eds.) (1994) Good gossip. University Press of Kansas. Pp.56-64
Noon, M. & Delbridge, R. (1993), “News from behind my hand: gossip in organizations”, Organization Studies, Vol.14 No. 1, pp.23-36
Ofra Nevo, Baruch Nevo, and Anat Deretch-Zehavi, “The Tendency to Gossip as a Psychological Disposition: Constructing a Measure and Validating it.” In Robert F. Goodman & Aaron Ben-Ze’ev. (eds.) (1994) Good gossip. University Press of Kansas. pp. 180-189.
Paine, R. (1967) What is gossip about? An alternative hypothesis. Man, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp.278-285.
Tannen, D. (1990), You just don’t understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York.
Throne, B. & Henley, N. (eds.) (1975) Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. Massachusetts: Newbury House.
Rogers, E. and Rogers, R. (1976) Communication in Organizations, The Free Press, New York, NY.
Rosnow, R. L. (1977), “Gossip and marketplace psychology”, Journal of Communication, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 158-63.
Rosnow, R. L. (1988), “Rumor as communication: a contextual approach”, Journal of Communication, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp.12-28.
Rysman, A. (1977) “How the ‘gossip’ became a woman”, Journal of Communication, Vol. 27 No.1, pp.176-80.
Skowronski, J. J. & Carlston, D. E. (1987) Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 52 No.4, pp.689-699.
Suls, J.M. (1977) “Gossip as social comparison”, Journal of Communication, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 164-8.
Waddington, K. & Fletcher, C. (2005) Gossip and emotion in nursing and health-care organizations, Journal of Health Organization and Management, Vol.19 No. 4/5, pp. 378-394
Warber, M. Kathleen. The role of interpersonal jealousy in gossip: an evolutionary perspective. University of Arizona, Tucson, Department of Communication.
Wert, R. S. & Salovey, P. (2004) A Social Comparison Account of Gossip. Review of General Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 2, 122-137
Yerkovich, S. (1977). Gossiping as a way of speaking. Journal of Communication, Vol. 27 No.1, pp.192-196.
Zimmerman, D. & C. West (1975). ‘sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation’. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (eds.) (1975) Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. Pp. 105-29. Massachusetts: Newbury House.
吳毓淳 (2002) 林佳瑩博士指導 誰在八卦?一個社會網絡的分析 “Who is gossipy? A social network analysis of gossip” 國立政治大學 社會學研究所 碩士論文