相关文章推荐
拉风的猕猴桃  ·  JobRepositoryFactoryBe ...·  1 月前    · 
悲伤的茄子  ·  uni-app unipush + 个推 ...·  1 月前    · 
谈吐大方的拐杖  ·  FastAPI "coroutine ...·  6 月前    · 

CI 是一种 DevOps 最佳实践 ,也是 DevOps 生命周期 的一个阶段,期间,开发人员将代码签入其共享代码的代码仓库,通常每天数次。理想情况下,自动构建工具每次都会验证签入或分支,以确保没有错误并且已准备好投入生产。主要优势是通常会早期发现问题,避免累积成更大的问题。

采用 CI 意味着频繁集成较小的更改,而不是低频次地一次集成大量更新。将测试、合并和签入共享代码仓库更改的工作流程自动化,意味着团队能够以更快的速度交付更简洁的代码。更简洁的代码意味着更快的验证、更简洁的发布,以及更容易扩展的更高效的开发流程。

CI 是一种 DevOps 最佳实践 ,也是 DevOps 生命周期 的一个阶段,期间,开发人员将代码签入其共享代码的代码仓库,通常每天数次。理想情况下,自动构建工具每次都会验证签入或分支,以确保没有错误并且已准备好投入生产。主要优势是通常会早期发现问题,避免累积成更大的问题。

采用 CI 意味着频繁集成较小的更改,而不是低频次地一次集成大量更新。将测试、合并和签入共享代码仓库更改的工作流程自动化,意味着团队能够以更快的速度交付更简洁的代码。更简洁的代码意味着更快的验证、更简洁的发布,以及更容易扩展的更高效的开发流程。

CI 是一种 DevOps 最佳实践 ,也是 DevOps 生命周期 的一个阶段,期间,开发人员将代码签入其共享代码的代码仓库,通常每天数次。理想情况下,自动构建工具每次都会验证签入或分支,以确保没有错误并且已准备好投入生产。主要优势是通常会早期发现问题,避免累积成更大的问题。

采用 CI 意味着频繁集成较小的更改,而不是低频次地一次集成大量更新。将测试、合并和签入共享代码仓库更改的工作流程自动化,意味着团队能够以更快的速度交付更简洁的代码。更简洁的代码意味着更快的验证、更简洁的发布,以及更容易扩展的更高效的开发流程。

持续交付紧随 CI,您可以将其视为开发流程中的一个检查点阶段,位于在最终产品发布或部署给客户之前。验证代码更改后,它们会自动交付到代码仓库。

持续交付的目标是保持变更集足够小,使得主构建的任何更新都不会影响最终产品的”生产就绪”状态,如果它没有发布就绪。最终产品可能包含次要错误,但不会影响用户体验。

采用持续交付意味着开发人员可以花费更少的时间进行内部测试,因为这会确保只有稳定的代码才能进入交付阶段。它使 错误检测 成为一个更简单的过程,加快解决进度。

DevOps 是一种旨在提高软件开发效率的文化和流程。

CI/CD 流程是一组特定的阶段,这些阶段涉及支持 DevOps 生命周期的工具和自动化。尽管 CI/CD 是 DevOps 文化不可或缺的一部分,但 DevOps 的范围更广,涵盖了整个软件开发生命周期的更多内容 – 从协作到团队结构、再到可观测性、 版本控制 等等。

DevOps 的实施因组织而异,但从本质上讲,没有 CI/CD 就无法完成 DevOps。CI/CD 流程本质上与 DevOps 文化及其小规模频繁的发布过程联系在一起。

An agile workflow and CI/CD are related, however, they are not the same! They describe completely different aspects of the software development pipeline. Agile development, refers to the process or methodologies for managing workflows, meeting cadences, and team organization in software development. An agile methodology embraces change while accelerating delivery by listening and responding to customer needs and involving them in each stage of the development process.

CI/CD relies on automation to remove the human elements that create bottlenecks in releasing and improving the software. In both CI and CD testing is automated throughout the pipeline and is done frequently to minimize the costs and time it takes to remediate defects.

With CI/CD, releases should always be frequent to avoid future problems and assure your software is always in a releasable state - typically deploying multiple times a day. A common assumption with CI/CD teams should be implementing "constant" releases, however, this is not always the case. Your release cycle can vary widely depending on your product, your builds, and other factors you might want to take into consideration such as:

Is it a critical or minor fix?

Are you tracking regression counts from build to build?

Is there a QA team put in place?

Does the code base have unit tests?

Are there any code duplications?

These are just a few examples of aspects to consider when thinking about a release strategy and pipeline, but it differs drastically from team to team. Different products require different approaches.

There is no one size fits all answer to this question. Before investing in continuous deployment a business must first assess what the biggest risks are of their product and then determine the tradeoffs in how you want to deploy software. The success of your product is dependent on being able to quickly iterate, get feedback from your customers, and continue to make changes. Continuous deployment will be highly impactful and profitable if you are prioritizing shortening feedback loops and building a highly responsive business. However, if your business does not have many customers then the benefits of implementing increments of deployment will add less value and more costs. The staging environment you choose to deploy ultimately depends on your business needs, workflow, and budget.